Current-site review
A bounded inspection of the interface, content, responsive behaviour and relevant technical constraints.
Improve an existing website without losing what already works. We review its content, interface and technical constraints before defining the redesign or repair.
The job this service must do
An existing website should be understood before it is redesigned. Content, search visibility, integrations and operational constraints are reviewed so useful parts are preserved and real problems are prioritised.
A useful first scope
A small, isolated issue may fit the $49 Website Fix. Broader redesigns, unfamiliar codebases and ongoing care need a review and separate quote. Do not send passwords or production records in the project brief.
Service coverage
The final combination follows the project brief. Every included page, feature, integration and review point is named in the written scope before implementation.
A bounded inspection of the interface, content, responsive behaviour and relevant technical constraints.
A prioritised page and component plan that separates visual changes from structural or platform work.
Content, URLs, forms, analytics and integrations accounted for before the replacement goes live.
Key journeys, redirects and browser behaviour checked against the agreed acceptance scope.
Working process
The proposal names the review milestones. Timing depends on the number of pages and features, content readiness and third-party access.
Record current pages, platform, dependencies, business-critical paths and known problems.
Separate urgent defects, content problems, usability issues and long-term improvements.
Choose a focused repair, staged redesign or new implementation based on evidence and ownership.
Test redirects, forms, tracking, content and rollback steps before replacing the old site.
Starting price / USD
Maintenance. Final quote after scope.
Basic website maintenance with agreed routine checks, update frequency and a defined response window.
No unlimited changes, new pages, new features, emergency support, malware cleanup, server or database work, SLA or 24/7 support. Additional work and third-party fees are quoted separately.
Read all pricing boundaries ↗Scope decisions
The proposal records confirmed requirements and lists any unknowns that need a separate, bounded review.
A stable codebase with isolated problems may be repaired. Structural limits or unsupported dependencies can justify a rebuild.
Existing URLs, metadata and useful content need a redirect and review plan before launch.
Repository, hosting and service access should be confirmed with a recoverable backup before implementation.
Case study references
Each study identifies its public source, material status and the interface details being reviewed.
Explore working examples ↗Not usually. One small, clearly defined issue may fit the $49 Website Fix. Wider debugging, structural changes or multiple issues need a separate quote after review.
Frequently asked questions
Usually after a bounded review that identifies the stack, risk, reproducibility and whether the change can be estimated responsibly.
Useful URLs should normally be preserved. When one must change, the migration plan defines its redirect and metadata checks.
No. Ongoing care is optional and separately scoped. Handover is not conditional on a maintenance subscription.
Your next website
Let’s talk about what it needs to do.
Share your brief. We’ll review the scope and reply in writing.