Current state
Review the existing brand assets and touchpoints, available evidence, ownership and the practical constraint the work must address.
Review the current brand, identify what should stay and build a clearer direction for the next stage of the business.
The job this service must do
A rebrand should preserve useful recognition while resolving a clear business problem. The transition is planned across the places customers and staff will actually encounter it.
A useful first scope
Trademark searches, legal clearance, packaging production and large-scale rollout management require separate specialists or scope.
Service coverage
The final combination follows the project brief. Every included page, feature, integration and review point is named in the written scope before implementation.
Review the existing brand assets and touchpoints, available evidence, ownership and the practical constraint the work must address.
Define the brand audit required for the agreed first scope and record what remains outside it.
Develop the transition direction through reviewable decisions and a defined list of outputs.
Prepare the rollout plan and the files, checks or operating notes needed for handover.
Working process
The proposal names the review milestones. Timing depends on the number of pages and features, content readiness and third-party access.
Agree the audience, business goal, available brand assets and touchpoints and the decision this project needs to improve.
Name the change boundary, required inputs, review points, exclusions and acceptance criteria.
Work through a small number of reasoned directions, record feedback together and keep changes tied to the approved brief.
Check the agreed outputs, organise source files and document the next implementation or operating step.
Custom scope / USD
Custom Development. Final quote after scope.
A tailored website feature, application capability or internal tool. The first release is defined before quoting.
User accounts and business state move into application scope. Third-party licences extra.
Read all pricing boundaries ↗Scope decisions
The proposal records confirmed requirements and lists any unknowns that need a separate, bounded review.
Existing research, brand material, content, platform choices and account access should be separated from assumptions that still need a decision.
One named decision-maker and consolidated feedback prevent contradictory revision cycles and unclear acceptance.
The proposal identifies whether the work ends with a defined deliverable or continues into a separately scoped implementation.
Case study references
Each study identifies its public source, material status and the interface details being reviewed.
Explore working examples ↗Not automatically. The review identifies recognisable assets worth keeping and the parts that actively limit clarity or consistency.
Frequently asked questions
Yes. When both are needed, the proposal sequences shared decisions and states which deliverables belong to each part of the project.
The written proposal names the review stages and included revision rounds. Additional directions or production work are quoted before scope expands.
A concise brief, the available brand assets and touchpoints, the intended audience, one approval owner and any fixed platform, timing or compliance constraints.
Your next website
Let’s talk about what it needs to do.
Share your brief. We’ll review the scope and reply in writing.